CONCEPT OF «SPLIT SUBJECT» IN POETIC CREATIVITY ANNA LONGAREVA: WAR VS LOVE
Abstract
Bilchenko Evgeniya Vitalievna, Doctor of Culturology, Leading Researcher, Department of Screen Culture, Institute of Culturology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine. The relevance of the topic of the study is determined by the theoretical and applied significance of the synthesis of the theory of literature and psychoanalysis in culturological discourse. The aim of the study is a structural psychoanalysis of the concept of a «split subject» in contemporary Russian poetry and mechanisms for its overcoming through a «radical break» with the Imaginary and a conscious choice of love as a «truth-event», or Symbolic Real / «Immortal» (on the case of creativity by Anna Dolgareva). Research materials: poetry by Anna Dolgareva; English-language texts of cultural studies, Russian-language translations of western psychoanalytic; Russian religious philosophy of the late XIX - early XX centuries. Research methods: structuralist, poststructuralist, dialectic, hermeneutic, semiotic, comparative, dialogical. Research results: demonstration of the split subject of the contemporary poetic word in his bipolar aspect from profane to sacred, from buffoonery to foolishness, from barbarism to genius. The conclusion of the study is a modulation of psychoanalytic dialectic of semiosis Russian poetic hero on the «Borromean rings»: from «suture» (thesis – delight, buffoonery, barbarism, the Imaginary) through the de-suture (antithesis – war, alienation, hatred, Symbolic) to re-suture (synthesis – love, foolishness, genius, Real).
References
Badyu A. Apostol Pavel Obosnovanie universalizma. M.; SPb.: Moskovskij filosofskij fond, Universitetskaya kniga, 1999. [Bad'ju A. Apostol Pavel Obosnovanie universalizma. M.; SPb.: Moskovskij filosofskij fond, Universitetskaja kniga, 1999. (In Russ).]
Berdyaev N.A. O rabstve i svobode cheloveka. M.: Respublika, 1995. [Berdjaev N.A. O rabstve i svobode cheloveka. M.: Respublika, 1995. (In Russ).]
Vitgenshtejn L. Logiko-filosofskij traktat. M.: Kanon+; Reabilitaciya, 2008. [Vitgenshtejn L. Logiko-filosofskij traktat. M.: Kanon+; Reabilitacija, 2008. (In Russ).]
Dolgareva A. Uezzhayut navsegda. Lugansk : Bolshoj Donbass, 2016. [Dolgareva A. Uezzhajut navsegda. Lugansk : Bol'shoj Donbass, 2016. (In Russ).]
Zhizhek S. Realnost Virtualnogo / Videolekciya. URL:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDI1EKSAfQ4
Lakan Zh. Seminary. Kniga 11. Chetyre osnovnye ponyatiya psihoanaliza. M. : Gnozis; Logos, 2004. [Lakan Zh. Seminary. Kniga 11. Chetyre osnovnye ponjatija psihoanaliza. M. : Gnozis; Logos, 2004. (In Russ).]
Levinas E. Izbrannoe: Totalnost i beskonechnoe. M.; Spb.: Universitetskaya kniga, CGNII INION RAN; Kulturnaya iniciativa, 2000. [Levinas Je. Izbrannoe: Total'nost' i beskonechnoe. M.; Spb.: Universitetskaja kniga, CGNII INION RAN; Kul'turnaja iniciativa, 2000. (In Russ).]
Lotman Yu.M. Semiosfera; Kultura i vzryv; Vnutri myslyashih mirov; Stati; Issledovaniya; Zametki. SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPB, 2004. [Lotman Ju.M. Semiosfera; Kul'tura i vzryv; Vnutri mysljashhih mirov; Stat'i; Issledovanija; Zametki. SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPB, 2004. (In Russ).]
Cvetaeva M. Izbrannoe. Smolensk: Rusich, 2001. [Cvetaeva M. Izbrannoe. Smolensk: Rusich, 2001. (In Russ).]
Yaspers K. Smysl i prednaznachenie istorii. M.: Respublika, 1994. [Jaspers K. Smysl i prednaznachenie istorii. M.: Respublika, 1994. (In Russ).]
CC BY-ND
A work licensed in this way allows the following:
1. The freedom to use and perform the work: The licensee must be allowed to make any use, private or public, of the work.
2. The freedom to study the work and apply the information: The licensee must be allowed to examine the work and to use the knowledge gained from the work in any way. The license may not, for example, restrict "reverse engineering."
2. The freedom to redistribute copies: Copies may be sold, swapped or given away for free, in the same form as the original.